Ha'aretz, August 18, 2004
Let 'em starve to death
By Yitzhak Laor


Israel equating the Palestinian prisoner strike with a security risk is part of a pattern that does not necessarily have anything to do with such a risk or with terror. The existence of the Palestinians is
the problem in that equation. It is enough to see the attitude in the news reports toward the strike to understand that the only problem, as far as the Israeli establishment is concerned, is how to break the strike. As far as they are concerned, the Palestinians can "starve to death," said the public security minister, who immediately orders his lackey, Chief Warden Yaakov Ganot, to confiscate cigarettes. After all, the hunger strikers will break immediately if the cigarettes are taken away. There is no more colonial an image than that. They are not fighting for their freedom, they are fighting to destroy us, even inside their cells, in their chains.

Only someone who does not understand that a fight for freedom stems from a despair of life at its lowest level can ascribe to hunger-striking prisoners - many of whom have been languishing for years in prison despite Israeli promises to free them 11 years ago - the charges of which Ganot and the police minister have accused the Palestinians.

There is no need to mix basic humanitarian demands and the demand to free the prisoners, but nevertheless most of the media lines up with the security authorities and identifies the humanitarian demands with our security. "Their existence is our non-security" has been the message since the strike began.

Those who want more evidence of the moral depths to which Israel has sunk can find them in the utter silence that met Tzachi Hanegbi's response: let them starve to death. That answer will yet go down in the history books regarding the last colonialist struggle in the world. Only a demagogue can bring into the discussion the nature of the crimes of the striking prisoners. They are in prison for those crimes, and the conditions in the prisons are horrifying, but the punishment that the court imposed does not include daily strip searches, and lengthy denials of visits from children, elderly parents, and wives.

Sometimes it seems that the great tribunal of Israel - as in the case of Mordechai Vanunu, and the comments made by MK Yuval Steinitz about Vanunu - works overtime, and makes every effort it can to turn the legal system into a small part of a larger punitive system. It seems as if the sentence was only the begining of the punishment, and the court has nothing to do with what happens next: a kind of "good riddance it's gone," as they are handed over to Hanegbi and Ganot.

Those who do not understand the connection between the death that the public security minister is offering them and the daily newspaper reports about assassination warnings that are no longer "exact" - but still kill dozens of Palestinians who are all "on their way to terror attacks inside Israel" - does not understand that the Israeli world
view really only has room for one solution for the Palestinian people: that they disappear. It is not terror that is the problem from that perspective, nor borders, but the very existence of that people. That problem has no other solution and so the those people must be fenced in, walled in, put in cells - all in the name of "security, because there is no other solution."

Against this background the strike takes place, like some metaphor for our lives. Inside the closed cells, under terrible conditions, strike the Palestinian prisoners - those punished for murder and those not punished for murder - and outside, in the yard, the Israelis barbecue meat. The great depth to which we have fallen
evidenced by our reaction to the hunger strike, is the same distance that the public security minister has traveled since 1979. That's when Tzachi Hanegbi popped up on the Jerusalem campus equipped with iron chains, together with today's agriculture minister Yisrael Katz, at the head of Likud pogromists to beat strikers and Arab students.
He has gone far in our lives. "Let `em die" is his answer nowadays, and nobody opens a mouth, and nobody booes.

Nach oben